Social Network

Quick thoughts, shares, and interactions with the community. These are my digital breadcrumbs.

school star_rate

Futura

2020-03-11
"L'année durait 372 jours au temps des dinosaures"
star_rate school

Futura

2020-03-10
"Une météorite a détruit l'un des premiers villages sédentaires."
build star_rate

YouTube

2020-03-08
"Engineering with Origami"
school star_rate

midilibre.fr

2020-01-18
"Gard : une grotte fabuleuse découverte à Barjac... et qui restera secrète"
star_rate school

YouTube

2020-01-15
"That Time the Mediterranean Sea Disappeared"
nature flash_on school star_rate

Futura

2019-12-07
"Surprise : les plantes ont un «langage» à base d'ultrasons" par Futura-Sciences
flare star_rate

YouTube

2019-09-13
"Ainsi parlait Zarathoustra - Friedrich Nietzsche"
wand_stars flare star_rate

YouTube

2019-07-28
Why do you want to make the world a better place? by Alan Watts
flash_on star_rate

AgoraVox

2019-07-27
La Malédiction de l’Intelligence par AgoraVox
egg star_rate

YouTube

2019-05-12
About vaccines, by Kurzgesagt
pets flash_on star_rate

YouTube

2019-04-21
About dolphin's intelligence by National Geographic
star_rate

YouTube

2019-04-20
Well there is much much more to say on that topic than what's already published. This story is not all that there is. Because all the Maths tricks of that kind use the same "apply on itself" system, that don't fit with reality. Because for example you can eat anything you like, but can you eat yourself and continue to live? No! So "in reality", we don't have stuff that loop onto themselves and continue to exist. You can't time travel and change your past because that's a paradoxe and paradoxes don't exist outside of your mind, therefore time travel is impossible. And this Maths demonstration is false because it just proves that "it" is wrong which doesn't say anything about Mathematics as a whole. You can't put in a box, a larger box, nature prevents it. So no algorithm can answer the halting problem because if such a program could answer the problem without solving it, then it would inevitably be way bigger and more complex than the original program and therefore, the cost for solving the question would never be avoided.

Question?

We'd like to hear from you.